It is hard for the average saint to see that the
period covered by the Acts, was one when nothing was settled, except in
the mind of God. Not only were the saints in a state of
uncertainty, but even Christ Himself, Who had said, while on earth, that
He did not know the hour or day of His future advent, Matthew 24:36, was
STANDING, (not sitting), at the right hand of God, as if ready to come
back to earth, Acts 7:55. This is in contrast to the fact that,
after God's plan became evident, He was "SEATED at the right hand
of the Majesty in the heights," Hebrews 1:3. It is
significant that the Lord had said, just before His ascension, that the
times or eras were in the FATHER'S jurisdiction, Acts 1:7. This
not only leaves out the apostles, but the Lord, Himself.
Peter, who, on the day of Pentecost, said the great
demonstration of that day was "that which has been declared through
the prophet Joel." Acts 2:16, could not know that many
hundreds of years would pass before the prophecy would be fulfilled in
its entirety. Three thousand were added to the ecclesia on
Pentecost, and other thousands later. It really looked like the
kingdom was proceeding apace, and would soon be n full function.
But when Israel. responded to God's mercy by stoning Stephen, the
movement began its downhill journey.
In preparation for the time the nations would be
blessed in spite of Israel's failure, God called Saul, when he was
outside the land of Israel. However, His purpose was concealed,
and the ecclesia noted the "conversion" of its arch enemy,
mainly by the fact that persecution practically ceased. Saul was
taken away into Arabia, Galatians 1:17, but this fact is not noted in
the Acts. The calling of this foremost of sinners is given in
detail in that account, because it is a picture of the future advent of
Christ to Israel. But the sojourn in Arabia is in accord with
present grace, (for Saul must learn something which the apostles of
Israel could not teach him,) and this seems to be the reason why it is
omitted from the Acts account. It should be evident that if Paul
was to herald the message that was being heralded by the twelve, this
"theological course" in the desert would have been
unnecessary.
The Lord now does another thing which is "out of
line" with Jewish tradition. He sends Peter to Caesarea to
herald the evangel to a man of the nations, Cornelius, a so-called
Gentile, Acts 10. This was not followed up. Peter was not
the apostle to the nations. His one experience was necessary, in
order that he might be able to help Paul at the Jerusalem conference,
Acts. 15. Peter's later contact with people of the nations does
not reflect any credit to him, Galatians 2:11, 12.
During the Acts period the powers of the kingdom were
present. The dead were roused, the sick wer healed, and offenders
were executed, as this will be done in the coming eon.
Finally, James, who was not an apostle, pushed Peter
and the others aside, and usurped the place as head of the
ecclesia. This was distinctly a downward step. From that
time forward, the kingdom was "dying," until its demise was
accomplished at the close of the Acts. In other words, the Jewish
ecclesia "went down until it hit the bottom."
It is interesting to study the career of Barnabas, in
connection with that of Paul. Barnabas was a Levite, and expected
the kingdom to be established in his day, as is evidenced by the fact
that he sold a field and placed the money in the common fund, Acts 4:36,
37. He was the one who introduced Saul to the disciples,
9:27. He was sent by the Jerusalem ecclesia, as a delegate to
Antioch. When he saw evidence of the work of grace in that city he
went to Tarsus and found Saul, and brought him to Antioch,
11:22-26. Later the two were sent from Antioch to Jerusalem with
help for the poor saints, verse 30. They later returned to
Antioch, 12:25.
The Lord, through the holt spirit, told the ecclesia
in Antioch to sever from the others, Barnabas and Saul, "for the
work to which I have called them," 13:1-3. Accordingly they
were sent away by the ecclesia. They had been called to a special
ministry. It soon developed that people of the nations would hear
and believe, while those of the Jewish nation, for the nest part, would
not. In the first recorded meeting, Sergius Paul believed and
Gar-Jesus was blinded. The position of the former marks him as one
who was of the nations, while the name of the other distinguishes him as
a Jew. In this "encounter" Paul was the only
speaker. It was here that the apostle's name was changed to Paul,
meaning Interval. What was done in this case seems to have been
prophetic.
John Mark, cousin of Barnabas, who was with them
turned back. In Antioch, Pidisia, Paul was again the
speaker. Here he mentioned justification, and showed it to be a
departure from the Circumcision evangel. He said, "Through
this One is being announced to you the pardon of sins, and from all from
which you could not be justified in the law of Moses, in this One
everyone who is believing is being justified," 13:38, 39.
Pardon is Circumcision gospel. It was being announced, and then
Paul went beyond that, and promised justification. Paul and
Barnabas both spoke afterwards. But the Jews objected to the
evangel, and both speakers announced that they were turning to the
nations. As many of them as were set for eonian life
believed.
Space will not permit tracing the journey all the
way, but in Acts 14:26 we find them back in Antioch. Soon
thereafter they go to Jerusalem to have the question of circumcision
settled. James, head of the ecclesia, decides it is not necessary
for believers among the nations to be circumcised, but he places them
under certain decrees, and directs Barnabas and Paul to take them to the
ecclesias.
In Jerusalem it was seen that Paul had been entrusted
with the evangel of the Uncircumcision and James, Peter and John gave
him and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship, that they should go to
the nations, Galatians 2:6-10. Notice, Paul does not say that
Barnabas, too, had been entrusted with the evangel of the
Uncircumcision. The purpose 9of their special mission was now
understood. Both were for the nations, but only Paul had the
evangel that was needed. It seems that Barnabas is a type of those
who will go to the nations during the "millennium." Then
the nations will be brought under the leadership of Israel. Now,
Paul is to evangelize the nations with a view to building up an ecclesia
that will uphold the doctrine of pure grace, while Israel is
calloused. While the present ecclesia evidently began at Antioch,
Acts 13:1 yet Paul did not begin to teach its distinctive doctrine by
epistle, until after Barnabas was no longer actively with him.. Barnabas
does not go with Paul on his second journey. Yet Paul continues to
recognize the pre-eminence of the Jewish ecclesia, by giving out the decrees
from James.
It was during Paul's second journey that he wrote his
earliest epistles. The last ones were written during his
imprisonment in Rome. Not until then did the ecclesia emerge from
under the jurisdiction of the Jerusalem ecclesia. Israel is set
aside, and those Jews in the body of Christ are reconciled to those of
the nations, and the ecclesia becomes a joint body, Ephesians 2 and
3.
(To Be Continued)